Sunday, June 15, 2008

You're gonna wind up workin' in a gas station


Ever think that maybe, just maybe, that Big Oil was illegally price fixing? Well, they are:
Criminal charges have been laid against 13 people and 11 companies accused of fixing the price of gas in Quebec, the federal Competition Bureau said Thursday.

The suspects and companies operated in Victoriaville, Thetford Mines, Magog and Sherbrooke.

Three companies and one person pleaded guilty in Quebec Superior Court in Victoriaville on Thursday to related charges.

The companies, which included Ultramar Ltd., face up to $2 million in fines in total.

. . . The bureau alleges the gas retailers — individual operators who ran their stations under the banners of Shell, Esso, Petro-Canada and Irving oil — called each other to agree on prices.

2 things here:

1st, note that the "fixing" was allegedly done by individual retailers. The companies would never, ever, tell their dealers to do something like that. Yeah, right.

2nd, it's Canada, so while it may affect some of us (cough'darkblack'cough), what's the importance to Americans?

This from Ultramar Ltd.'s web site:
Ultramar Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Valero

And who is Valero? Here in L.A., no one I had heard of before about 4 or 5 years ago when their gas stations started popping up like mushrooms after a rain storm. But here's who they say they are:
Valero Energy Corporation is a Fortune 500 company based in San Antonio, Texas, and incorporated in Delaware. Valero's common stock is listed for trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "VLO." The company has approximately 22,000 employees and assets valued at $38 billion.

The largest refiner in North America, Valero has an extensive refining system with a throughput capacity of approximately 3.1 million barrels per day. The company's geographically diverse refining network stretches from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast and West Coast to the Caribbean.

Valero has a mid-stream logistics system that supports Valero's refining and marketing operations.

A marketing leader, Valero has approximately 5,800 retail and wholesale stores in the United States, Canada and the Caribbean under various brand names including Valero, Diamond Shamrock, Shamrock, Ultramar, and Beacon. The company markets on a retail and wholesale basis through a bulk and rack marketing network in 44 U.S. states, Canada, Latin America and the Caribbean.

Emphasis mine. Big-time players, apparently. Here's more from Wikipedia about this company many of us in SoCal had never heard of before:
Valero was created on January 1, 1980, as a spinoff from the Coastal States Gas Corporation. At the time, it was the largest corporate spinoff in U.S. history. Valero took over the natural gas operations of the LoVaca Gathering Company, a defunct subsidiary of Coastal States Gas. The name Valero comes from Misión San Antonio de Valero, the mission founded in 1718 from which the city of San Antonio started, which is better known worldwide as The Alamo.

The company acquired a small oil refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 1981, and began refining operations in 1984.

In 1997, Valero spun off its refining and retail divisions into a separate company, which kept the Valero name. At the same time, the remaining divisions, which consisted primarily of natural gas operations, were acquired by PG&E. Later that year, Valero acquired Basis Petroleum, which left it with four refineries in Texas and Louisiana.

Valero acquired a Paulsboro, New Jersey, refinery in 1998. This was the company's first refinery outside of the Gulf Coast area.

In 2000, Valero purchased ExxonMobil's Benicia, California, refinery and interests in 350 Exxon-branded service stations in California, mainly in the San Francisco Bay area. The company also began retailing gasoline under the Valero brand. In June 2001, the company acquired the Huntway Refining Company, along with two asphalt plants on the west coast.

On December 31, 2001, Valero completed its acquisition of Ultramar Diamond Shamrock. This merger left Valero with over 4,700 retail sites in the U.S., Canada, and the Caribbean. With this acquisition, Valero also received ownership of Shamrock Logistics L.P., which was renamed Valero L.P. This limited partnership owns and operates a 7200 mile (11500 km) pipeline network and 57 refined product terminals in the U.S., and is publicly traded (Valero maintained a 13.6 percent indirect interest through Valero GP Holdings, LLC, also publicly traded, which in 2006 it fully divested).

Starting in 2002, Valero has been expanding its marketing to the East Coast, specifically the Northeast and Florida, using the Valero brand.

On April 25, 2005, Valero agreed to buy Premcor, Inc., for 8 billion in cash and stock to become the largest U.S. refiner, as record prices for gasoline and other fuels boost profits.

On June 30, 2005, Valero announced it was beginning a two-year process of converting Diamond Shamrock stations to the Valero brand.

And as we might expect:
According to the University of Massachusetts’ Political Economy Research Institute, the Valero Energy Corporation is the 28th most toxic corporation in America, releasing 3,363,294 pounds of toxic chemicals into the air annually. [1] Valero has been sued on multiple occasions for allegedly damaging the environment, and was named as a defendant in suits in 2000 and 2001 pertaining to the contamination of groundwater.[2] In a 2005 Clean Air Act settlement with the EPA, Valero agreed, along with Sunoco, to reduce annual harmful emissions by 44,000 tons annually across 18 refineries.[3]

In other words, a typical GWBush-style Oil company. On that note, who did they give money too? Lots of folks, both Rep & Dem:

ANDREWS, ROBERT E House of RepsDemocratNJ 01G$2,50010/19/1999
BARTON, JOE LINUS House of RepsRepublicanTX 06G$5,00012/01/1999
BENTSEN, KENNETH E JR House of RepsDemocratTX 25G$1,00009/30/1999
BENTSEN, KENNETH E JR House of RepsDemocratTX 25P$1,00006/02/2000
BENTSEN, KENNETH E JR House of RepsDemocratTX 25G$1,00009/21/2000
BENTSEN, KENNETH E JR House of RepsDemocratTX 25G$1,00002/15/2000
BINGAMAN, JEFF SenateDemocratNM --G$1,00006/11/1999
BONILLA, HENRY House of RepsRepublicanTX 23G$1,00009/30/1999
BONILLA, HENRY House of RepsRepublicanTX 23G$1,00003/08/1999
BUSH, GEORGE W PresidentRepublicanTX --G$1,00005/27/1999
BUSH, GEORGE W PresidentRepublicanTX --G$2,50004/01/1999
CANTOR, ERIC IVAN House of RepsRepublicanVA 07G$50006/02/2000
CHAFEE, LINCOLN D SenateRepublicanRI --G$1,00006/02/2000
DELAY, THOMAS DALE House of RepsRepublicanTX 22G$5,00009/11/2000
EDWARDS, CHET House of RepsDemocratTX 11G$1,00010/02/2000
EDWARDS, CHET House of RepsDemocratTX 11G$1,00006/02/2000
FROST, MARTIN House of RepsDemocratTX 24G$1,00008/24/1999
FROST, MARTIN House of RepsDemocratTX 24G$1,00002/15/2000
GONZALEZ, CHARLES A House of RepsDemocratTX 20G$1,00009/21/2000
GONZALEZ, CHARLES A House of RepsDemocratTX 20G$1,00003/08/1999
GONZALEZ, CHARLES A House of RepsDemocratTX 20G$1,00002/15/2000
GONZALEZ, CHARLES A House of RepsDemocratTX 20G$50012/01/1999
GREEN, RAYMOND EUGENE "GENE" House of RepsDemocratTX 29G$2,50002/15/2000
LAMPTON, DUNNICA OH House of RepsRepublicanMS 04G$1,00010/02/2000
LOTT, C TRENT SenateRepublicanMS --P$2,50005/27/1999
RODRIGUEZ, CIRO D House of RepsDemocratTX 28G$1,00003/08/1999
RODRIGUEZ, CIRO D House of RepsDemocratTX 28G$50006/02/2000
SANDLIN, MAX House of RepsDemocratTX 01G$1,00009/30/1999
SANDLIN, MAX House of RepsDemocratTX 01G$1,00002/15/2000
SANDLIN, MAX House of RepsDemocratTX 01P$1,00006/02/2000
SMITH, LAMAR SEELIGSON House of RepsRepublicanDC 21G$1,00003/08/1999
SMITH, ROBERT C SenateRepublicanNH --G$1,00006/02/2000
SNEARY, LOY E House of RepsDemocratTX 14G$50002/15/2000
SNEARY, LOY E House of RepsDemocratTX 14G$1,00010/02/2000
SNOWE, OLYMPIA J SenateRepublicanME --G$1,00010/02/2000
TREEN, DAVID CONNER House of RepsRepublicanLA 01G$50005/27/1999
WAREING, PETER STAUB House of RepsRepublicanTX 07G$1,00001/10/2000
WHITMAN, CHRISTINE TODD SenateRepublicanNJ --G$5,00008/09/1999
YOUNG, C W BILL House of RepsRepublicanDC 10G$1,00010/19/1999



Disheartening how many TX-D Reps are on that list from 2000.

According to this
, retired CEO William Greehey is a big Republican supporter, donating $$$ to:

JohnMcCain
Mitt Romney
Kay Bailey Hutchinson
John Cornyn
Ciro Rodriguez (DINO)
Lamar Smith
Henry Bonilla
Bill Richardson (?)
Pete Sessions
and of course,
George W. Bush

Interestingly, Richardson sold a good sized chunk of Valero stock last year:

SANTA FE, N.M. — Democratic presidential candidate Bill Richardson, who promotes renewable energy as a way to wean the nation off of fossil fuels, has sold his stock holdings in the country's largest independent refining company.

Richardson owned stock in Valero Energy Corp. worth between $100,001 and $250,000, and had stock options valued between $250,001 and $500,000, according to a financial disclosure report filed earlier this month with the Federal Election Commission.

Richardson said Thursday he sold the oil company stock because "it was just a distraction" in his campaign.

"Because I was getting questions, I just felt it was best to divest myself," Richardson said.

However, he lauded Valero, calling it a "very reputable company that does important work."

Richardson served on Valero's board of directors from 2001 until June 2002, when he resigned after winning the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in New Mexico. He served as energy secretary in the Clinton administration in 1998-2000.

Oh, that explains it. Great, Now one of the alleged rising stars is a Big Oil suckup. You just dropped far lower on my personal support list, Bill.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

Four brothers who are blowin our horns


Our good friend Brad Friedman of BradBlog guest-hosted the Peter B. Collins syndicated radio show this week. He asked a few other L.A.-based bloggers to come by for a round-table discussion of stuff and events.

I was glad to come by and check in with Brad. Also in studio were Howie Klein, D.L. "Bear" Bruin, with David "DDay" Dayen by phone. Brad was his usual smooth and witty self, Howie is chocked full of insider politics and Congressional race info from his Blue America work, Bear was funny, and I managed to not sound like a complete doofus.

The Collins radio show isn't syndicated in Southern CA, but the audio was all recorded and you can hear it by going to this link. Scroll down the page and click the link to the 3rd hour.


Photos taken by the lovely and talented Desi Doyen, who helped produce the show and is probably smarter than all 4 guys put together. Thanks, Desi!

The Middle Name Is Danger...Baby

The Middle Name Is Danger

Long as I remember, the rain been comin down

I currently live in a flyover state and I know that Baby the Rain Must Fall, but enough is enough!


If this keeps up we'll all be asking "What's a cubit?"




Cross posted at VidiotSpeak

The rich get rich and the poor get children, Ain't we got fun


Tim Russert was a decent family man, and a frustrating journalist. He epitomized "gotcha" tactics (see Obama/Rev. Wright) while often failing to go after real issues, like why we were about to invade Iraq. His passing is sad.

But cynic that I am, my 2nd thought after hearing of his death was that someone, likely on the right, would use the twofer of Russert's passing and Friday to do some kind of document dump, in hopes the media would ignore an real news.

I'm still not sure if that happened, but my blog buddy Blue Girl has found some real news, and it ain't pretty:
A federal judge has ruled in favor of the American Small Business League (ASBL), and ordered the Small Business Administration (SBA) to provide the ASBL with more than 10,000 pages of data that listed the names of all firms that received federal small business contracts for fiscal years 2005 and 2006.

The ASBL filed suit to obtain the data, alleging that the SBA had covered up the fact that small business contracts were going to large companies. Now the ASBL is charging that the SBA manipulated the data that was turned over after a court order ruled the ASLB was entitled to see it.
- In May of 2007, the SBA went so far as to issue a press release titled, "Myth vs. Fact: SBA and Government Contracting," which stated that it is a myth that large companies, including large, multinational corporations are taking away federal contracts specifically intended for small businesses. After reviewing the data, the ASBL and both third party experts all found that the Bush Administration had in fact included billions of dollars in awards to Fortune 500 corporations and other large businesses in the United States and Europe in its small business contracting statistics. The Bush Administration falsified their compliance with the congressionally mandated 23 percent small business contracting goal by including such corporate giants as Dyncorp, Battelle Memorial Institute, Hewlett Packard, Government Technology Services Inc (GTSI), Bechtel, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, General Electric, Northstar Aerospace, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. and Raytheon. (http://www.sba.gov/idc/groups/public/documents/sba_homepage/news_07-30.pdf)


. . . Up to $800 billion, diverted from small businesses and the middle class American economy. We're perilously close to talking about real money here.

The ASBL is continuing to audit the data and a more detailed report on their findings will be released within 30 days. The information is now available on the ASBL's website.

Nice. The rich get rich and the rest of us can go suck eggs. Just another Right-wing affirmative action program in full bloom.

Bastards.

For an extra little treat,click on the image below for a 1921 recording of the song. Still very applicable today.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

One more reason not to shop at Wal-Mart

After the delicate way they've handled this case... (my bold)
HOUSTON -- A college student’s trip to Wal-Mart last month ended with her in handcuffs and a two-day stay in the Harris County jail.

Nitra Gipson was charged with felony forgery after the Meyer Park Wal-Mart manager accused her of passing bogus money orders. Thing is, the money orders were legit and had been purchased at Wal-Mart to begin with.

The cash-strapped college student had just sold her car to pay for her last two semesters at Texas Southern University, where she is studying criminal justice. She was paid with Wal-Mart money orders, which the giant retailer advertises as “good as cash.”

In Gipson’s case, they were as good as time behind bars.

“Humiliating is not the word for it,” said Gipson. “I was horrified. I think they singled me out because of the amount of money that it was and (thought) I was trying to get over on them.”

No manner of effort by Gipson to show that the money orders were legit worked. The store manager insisted she be charged.

The district attorney’s office saw it differently. Charges were dropped after the money orders were verified when Gipson provided the purchase receipts.

But after spending 48 hours behind bars, the damage had already beeen done.

“Wal-Mart should be held responsible and accountable for letting this child go to jail for two days. All because she was doing what any customer of Wal-Mart should do,” said community activist Quannel X.

Gipson said Wal-Mart then added insult to injury when she got a letter in the mail.

“I started to read it and thought, ‘Oh my God.’ They are asking me to pay them when it was clearly their mistake,” said Gipson.

The letter demanded Gipson pay Wal-Mart $200 to settle a shoplifting charge. It is a charge that never existed, though.

When 11 News contacted Wal-Mart officials they said they were looking into the case and would provide no further details.

The spokesperson did claim that the decision to pursue charges was up to the law enforcement officials on the scene. But the copy of the criminal complaint obtained by 11 News, shows that the store manager is who pressed charges.
Lawsuit anyone?

crossposted at Rants from the Rookery

Monday, June 09, 2008

You say you got a real solution, Well, you know, We'd all love to see the plan

I heard David Sirota speak Monday night about his new book, Uprising, at an event sponsored by Brave New Films & Robert Greenwald at their west side offices.

According to David, there have been 3 populist uprisings in the last 100 years: 1932, with the rise of FDR and the New Deal, 1964 and the official acceptance that Civil Rights was a new issue, and 1980, when dissatisfaction led to the awful Reagan years. He explains more in a column he wrote:
The uprising against liberalism during the late 1970s became the conservative movement of the 1980s, which deregulated the economy and fed the military-industrial complex.

It is that rebellion three decades ago that tells us we are indeed experiencing another uprising.

Just like the late 1970s, America currently faces the telltale signs of all insurrections: an economic emergency, a financial meltdown, an energy crisis and a national security quagmire.

Political analysts say this is bad news for the Right because George W. Bush sits atop today's mess, and conservatives have responded by running away from the president and by attempting to channel the outrage into their old anti-tax, anti-immigrant, anti-government agenda. But that misunderstands what has changed.

According to Gallup's survey data, the public has not only lost confidence in the political system as it did in the late 1970s, but also in corporations.. In 1979, one in three Americans told Gallup's pollsters they had confidence in big business.

By 2007, a little less than one in five expressed the same confidence. In 1979, almost two out of three citizens said they had faith in banks. Today, only two out of five say the same thing.

This is the real problem for a conservative movement that has become a wholly owned subsidiary of corporate America. Unlike 1980, when Ronald Reagan rode the conservative uprising to a landslide victory, the country is not looking for a movement that gets the government to back off big business, nor are we looking for politicians who pretend the Enrons and Bear Stearnses are victims. This uprising is searching for a movement that gets big business back under control and leaders who are serious about aiming "law and order" rhetoric not at dark-skinned people, but at the royalists whose greed is driving the economy into the ground.

The uprising against liberalism during the late 1970s became the conservative movement of the 1980s, which deregulated the economy and fed the military-industrial complex.

It is that rebellion three decades ago that tells us we are indeed experiencing another uprising.

Just like the late 1970s, America currently faces the telltale signs of all insurrections: an economic emergency, a financial meltdown, an energy crisis and a national security quagmire.

Political analysts say this is bad news for the Right because George W. Bush sits atop today's mess, and conservatives have responded by running away from the president and by attempting to channel the outrage into their old anti-tax, anti-immigrant, anti-government agenda. But that misunderstands what has changed.

According to Gallup's survey data, the public has not only lost confidence in the political system as it did in the late 1970s, but also in corporations.. In 1979, one in three Americans told Gallup's pollsters they had confidence in big business.

By 2007, a little less than one in five expressed the same confidence. In 1979, almost two out of three citizens said they had faith in banks. Today, only two out of five say the same thing.

This is the real problem for a conservative movement that has become a wholly owned subsidiary of corporate America. Unlike 1980, when Ronald Reagan rode the conservative uprising to a landslide victory, the country is not looking for a movement that gets the government to back off big business, nor are we looking for politicians who pretend the Enrons and Bear Stearnses are victims. This uprising is searching for a movement that gets big business back under control and leaders who are serious about aiming "law and order" rhetoric not at dark-skinned people, but at the royalists whose greed is driving the economy into the ground.

My copy of the book just arrived today, I'm going to start reading it right away. David is a really smart guy, even if he is just 32. Almost every guitar I own is older than him, but none writes as well as he does.

Update: "The Uprising" made the NYTimes' best seller list today. Congratulations, David.

Divide and Conquer ... or ... That was Yesterday, And Yesterday's Gone


I remember the day that John Kennedy was assassinated. I was just in grade school, but I remember that day the teacher came in and told us the news that The President had been shot.

I remember the day that Martin Luther King was assassinated.

I remember Robert Kennedy coming into my city and breaking the news to us. And due to Bobby's speech there were no riots, there was just a shared sense of loss.

I remember the day that Bobby Kennedy was assassinated. I remember being woken up and told the news and not believing it. It had to be a nightmare.

I had worked for his campaign, sure it was only stapling posters and stuffing envelopes, but I met him, got his autograph, heard him speak from 30 feet away, and I was inspired by him ... and when I heard of his death I just thought 'this can't be true!'

But it was true. 3 of America's best of the best had been assassinated within 5 years.

And that day was the day that I wondered if my love for the American ideals I'd been brought up to believe in were just bullet holes and blood stains.

I've come by my cynicism honestly. I've lived thru Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush! (WTF!?, A Bush TWICE!)

My ideals have suffered under all of them. Maybe I'm just naive. Maybe I'm a patriot. Maybe I just thought we can be what WE THE PEOPLE said we can be.

But that was yesterday, and yesterday's gone. Today I feel like we have a chance, just a chance, of reclaiming the ideals on which our country was founded.

I read the polls and it seems currently to be a statistical dead heat between Obama and McCain. How is this possible?

71% of the country disapprove of Bush's performance. And McCain not only endorses Bush's policies, he wants to expand them: Roe V. Wade overturned; More tax cuts for rich Americans; indefinite occupation of Iraq; attacking Iran; less health insurance for most Americans; less benefits for our troops; extending illegal spying on Americans, etc, etc, etc.

So, how is it possible that overwhelmingly most of our country disagrees with McCain yet the polling has them in a statistical heat!?

As FallenMonk noted; "The areas of the country where people are spending over 10% of their income today on gasoline are smack dab in the middle of the most reliable Republican-voting states. You do have to wonder why they can't see it, but regardless we obviously have our job to do."

I will be the first one to admit that I don't know why folks have consistently voted against their interests.

But I have a supposition: It's always been about the politics of divide. It is based in ignorance, amplifies a non-existent 'problem', bullhorns a lie long enough that folks who are actually just trying to make a living hear nothing but that echo echo echo chamber.

Why else would politicians be able to pit the majority of Americans against the majority of Americans? Examples to follow:
White men, women stole your jobs thru affirmative action!
White men, the black folks stole your jobs thru affirmative action!
White men, immigrants stole your jobs thru illegal immigration!

If you look at the history of the politics of divide it also includes Italians, Irish, Chinese, Greeks and ... name any other people who immigrated here. And we all immigrated here ... except for Native Americans, and the worst politics of divide were played against folks who were ALREADY HERE.

The one singular point that crops up, and is obvious thru all these false claims, is that rich people wanted to keep poor people divided so the rich could prosper even more ... at the expense of the poor.

And they have succeeded. Oh sure, there's always been folks in those communities, (AKA America), that have prospered against the norm. But almost always, after climbing the ladder, they kicked it out from under the ones who could have climbed up with them.

We need to talk to our brothers and sisters, our fathers and mothers, our neighborhood friends, the folks who live down the lane, and the folks who work next to us.

Maybe we don't even need to talk, maybe we just need to ask questions.

And if you ask the question 'will we be better off?'

And if they think about it, the answer should be clear.



Cross posted at VidiotSpeak

Here's Our Job

An article in the New York Times today highlights our job as liberals, Democrats and progressives over the next months before the November election. While it is easy to stand around and shake our heads in wonder at the way the conservative right vote it is much more important for us to understand why they vote the way they do and what we can do to change it. These are the people that are suffering worst from Shrub's economic policies. These are the people that will continue to suffer if McSame is elected. We really need to reach them and educate them. They need to understand that a vote for McSame in November is a vote for the same people that have been shafting them for years. They need to understand that these are the people who are making them have to decide whether to put gas the car or to buy food. They need to understand that they are the ones laboring hardest and suffering the most from the deliberate strategy of Shrub and Cheney and their collusion with the petroleum industry to make this country one that is painfully divided between the filthy rich and the devastatingly poor.

Across broad swaths of the South, Southwest and the upper Great Plains, the combination of low incomes, high gas prices and heavy dependence on pickup trucks and vans is putting an even tighter squeeze on family budgets.

Here in the Mississippi Delta, some farm workers are borrowing money from their bosses so they can fill their tanks and get to work. Some are switching jobs for shorter commutes.

People are giving up meat so they can buy fuel. Gasoline theft is rising. And drivers are running out of gas more often, leaving their cars by the side of the road until they can scrape together gas money.

The disparity between rural America and the rest of the country is a matter of simple home economics. Nationwide, Americans are now spending about 4 percent of their take-home income on gasoline. By contrast, in some counties in the Mississippi Delta, that figure has surpassed 13 percent.

As a result, gasoline expenses are rivaling what families spend on food and housing.

“This crisis really impacts those who are at the economic margins of society, mostly in the rural areas and particularly parts of the Southeast,” said Fred Rozell, retail pricing director at the Oil Price Information Service, a fuel analysis firm. “These are people who have to decide between food and transportation.”

A survey by Mr. Rozell’s firm late last month found that the gasoline crisis is taking the highest toll, as a percentage of income, on people in rural areas of the South, New Mexico, Montana, Wyoming and North and South Dakota.

With the exception of rural Maine, the Northeast appears least affected by gasoline prices because people there make more money and drive shorter distances, or they take a bus or train to work.

But across Mississippi and the rural South, little public transit is available and people have no choice but to drive to work. Since jobs are scarce, commutes are frequently 20 miles or more. Many of the vehicles on the roads here are old rundown trucks, some getting 10 or fewer miles to the gallon.

The survey showed that of the 13 counties where people spent 13 percent or more of their family income on gasoline, 5 were located in Mississippi, 4 were in Alabama, 3 were in Kentucky and 1 was in West Virginia.


There it is in black and white. The areas of the country where people are spending over 10% of their income today on gasoline are smack dab in the middle of the most reliable Republican-voting states. You do have to wonder why they can't see it, but regardless we obviously have our job to do. We need to understand why they continue to shoot themselves in the foot and figure out a way to make them quit. It won't be easy trying to convince these folks to change the way they've always voted. It will be very difficult and maybe even impossible to convince all of them that the Democrats aren't going to take away their Bibles and put gays in every Boy Scout troop but it is a job that needs to be done. We have to do our very best to instill in them the reality that their future under John McCain is going to be far worse than it is now and far worse than anything they can imagine with Barack Obama and the Democrats in charge.

Something's not right...

Photobucket

Bringing you the weekly top ten conservative idiots. Number 9 I just had to copy in full:
Daniel Pipes

For the longest time, Republicans had a winning electoral strategy: simply tell everyone that a vote for the Democrats means that the terrorists will attack America. Unfortunately that strategy doesn't seem to be working any more. Despite the Republicans' best efforts, the voting public steadfastly refused to crap their pants in 2006 and booted the GOP out of the House and Senate.

So what's next? They've got no ideas, they have a terrible record of failure, and their last best electoral strategy is a dud. Where do Republicans go from here?

Neo-con Daniel Pipes might have the answer. While discussing the possibility of an attack on Iran during an interview with National Review Online last week, he said:

What I suspect will be the case is, should the Democratic nominee win in November, President Bush will do something. And should it be Mr. McCain that wins, he'll punt, and let McCain decide what to do.

Or in other words, if you vote for Barack Obama this fall, hair-trigger George will lose his shit and start World War III.

I'm not sure if that's exactly a winning message for the McSame campaign, but it might be all they have left.
Which makes me print this pic again:

Photobucket

crossposted at Rants from the Rookery